4 ms·
Is there an inverse to this, more on the publisher side? I find myself wanting to cross-post more as social changes, and would like to be more systematic with
by pmayrgundter 3y ago
Is there an inverse to this, more on the publisher side? I find myself wanting to cross-post more as social changes, and would like to be more systematic with my OSS projects and company work as well. Seems like campaign mgmt SaaS, but I never feel inclined to go explore that market and your site feels better somehow.
e.g. I write a short summary for Twitter, slightly longer for mstdn, longer still for FB and full length for medium or a markdown readme. If I have media, include where possible.. incl primary screenshot/social preview selection, or multi-screenshot. Or video. Email support++
I see the value mainly as a time save, but also quality checker eg for staging w/previews, so the simplest version of this could be a static page that just help prepare the content.
It gets me thinking about managing/remembering logins, aggregating stats and responding to comments, etc.. I suppose CORS would kill this for the more proprietary channels. Should be APIs for the good ones.
And throw some AI in for good measure: during composition, let me start with what I have and fill out drafts for the rest. For responding to comments, maybe autosuggest short responses for common FAQs, or help me build FAQs as I go.
Sorry, don't mean to hijack.. haven't seen this being handled well.
- spencerflem 3y agoIn the indieweb community they like to do this and have invented the term "POSSE" for it (publish on own site, syndecate elsewhere). I like the style - the source of truth is something you own, and there's some tools they've made to automate it. I'm not active enough on social media to have a need for them myself so can't offer any personal recommendations but it might be worth checking out. https://indieweb.org/POSSE https://indieweb.org/POSSE
- pmayrgundter 3y agoThanks!