3 ms·
And by studied you mean come up with synthetic / theoretical models that are not verified against reality? Ignoring actual tailpipe emissions and focusing on l
by brandonagr2 3y ago
And by studied you mean come up with synthetic / theoretical models that are not verified against reality?
Ignoring actual tailpipe emissions and focusing on large PM10 particles like dust kicked up from the road is not a serious evaluation of the benefits of EVs vs combustion engines
- yuliyp 3y agoThis sub-thread came from someone specifically questioning a comment acdha had made about non-tailpipe emissions. To bring tailpipe emissions back up here is a bit of a non-sequitur.
- acdha 3y agoThat’s just one of many studies - look at the fishery damage caused by tires in the PNW next - but I’m not arguing against EVs, only that they are not a solution to pollution and any better world should involve fewer and smaller cars.