3 ms·
The assumption here is that being good at a job is what 'earns' a promotion. In fact, it can be the opposite; why risk promoting someone to a new role, when th
by jacknews 3y ago
The assumption here is that being good at a job is what 'earns' a promotion.
In fact, it can be the opposite; why risk promoting someone to a new role, when they are doing great at the current one?
What actually marks someone for promotion is clear potential for the target role, sometimes despite a not-so-good current performance, indeed sometimes because of it.
- CobrastanJorji 3y agoThat's the "Dilbert Principal:" Promote incompetent employees to management to minimize their ability to harm productivity.