4 ms·
Yes, there are using different wording in different articles: https://www.databricks.com/blog/introducing-dbrx-new-state-art-open-llm https://www.databricks.co
by patrick-fitz 3y ago
Yes, there are using different wording in different articles:
https://www.databricks.com/blog/introducing-dbrx-new-state-art-open-llm https://www.databricks.com/blog/introducing-dbrx-new-state-a...
The only mention of open source is:
> DBRX outperforms established open source models
https://www.databricks.com/blog/announcing-dbrx-new-standard-efficient-open-source-customizable-llms https://www.databricks.com/blog/announcing-dbrx-new-standard...
Open source is mentioned 10+ times
> Databricks is the only end-to-end platform to build high quality AI applications, and the release today of DBRX, the highest quality open source model to date, is an expression of that capability
https://github.com/databricks/dbrx https://github.com/databricks/dbrx
On Github it's described as an open license, not an open source license:
> DBRX is a large language model trained by Databricks, and made available under an open license.