4 ms·
No, i make the boring stupid AI stuff that actually works, and has a product market fit, and generally serves to reduce toil without reducing headcount on use c
by hprotagonist 3y ago
No, i make the boring stupid AI stuff that actually works, and has a product market fit, and generally serves to reduce toil without reducing headcount on use cases that concretely benefit the world.
consequently, i'm horribly underpaid relative to the 7- or 8- figure salaries the generative boys are getting right now!
- 8338550bff96 3y agoSame. Except reducing headcount is pretty much a focus of ours for 2024...
- hprotagonist 3y agoi work in a fairly real-world industry (manufacturing QA, reliability), so there is by policy and law always a final human QA step. My job is not trying to remove that step, it's trying to remove the drudgery and fatigue of looking at shittons of guaranteed true negatives all day and giving the human operator only the weird stuff to figure out.