11 ms·
Isn't that just really shrewd investing on Amazon's end though? Just because you've identified the win-win doesn't mean it's illegal? In fact it's what investme
by matthewaveryusa 3y ago
Isn't that just really shrewd investing on Amazon's end though? Just because you've identified the win-win doesn't mean it's illegal? In fact it's what investments should look like: companies that invest in other companies for the synergies.
- nescioquid 3y agoIt seems they could have made the same investment without the misrepresentation - or are you trying to say the misrepresentation itself is shrewd?
- theturtletalks 3y agoIt would be illegal if Anthropic can't sell those AWS credits on the open market which I'm thinking they can't. You're equating this to a stock swap but that is not the case.
- skhunted 3y agorubuquity’s comment said that it should be illegal; not that it was illegal. In order to close a loop hole or an unintended consequence one must first be aware of its existence. I don’t know enough about the topic but it does seem wrong, at a first glance, for this sort of accounting to be legal.