> No person without body autonomy can be considered 'secure in their person, houses, papers, or effects'. It wasn’t the southern states that imposed vaccine ma

> No person without body autonomy can be considered 'secure in their person, houses, papers, or effects'. It wasn’t the southern states that imposed vaccine mandates for dining in restaurants, either. I know what you’re alluding to; suffice to say that I don’t find this legal theory particularly compelling, and more importantly, neither does the Supreme Court.