I don't know a lot about this. But my first thought is better undercover, intelligence work? Follow through on citizenship deals for locals that cooperate with

I don't know a lot about this. But my first thought is better undercover, intelligence work? Follow through on citizenship deals for locals that cooperate with intelligence programs, grow & nurture those efforts. The biometric stuff just seems too dangerous to me, and unlike e.g. Nuclear arsenals, there's no peaceful game-theoretical equilibrium at MAD, I just see an extremely effective tool for the eradication of groups of people, and I don't trust human beings not to misuse that, especially with machine intelligence getting so powerful so fast. It all feels frighteningly unstable to me. edit: A perhaps more lucid way to explain what I mean: I am afraid of a world where the cost of eliminating a group of people is low enough that it outweighs the incentive to adapt & negotiate peaceful coexistence, even without what I see as an innate human bias towards destroying groups we don't like. Do violent, authoritarian regimes begin to gain an edge over peaceful, democratic ones?