3 ms·
I don't think that "look, raw brute force has this property" is at all useful in this context where you'd obviously actually compare a real attack not brute for
by tialaramex 3y ago
I don't think that "look, raw brute force has this property" is at all useful in this context where you'd obviously actually compare a real attack not brute force. There's no reason to believe (and every reason not to) that the same property somehow applies.
That Stack Exchange answer also immediately set off alarm bells in my head because it pretends to be entirely generic, but the obvious thing to do with entirely generic cryptographic intuitions is apply them to the One Time Pad and check their answers work. This intuition doesn't work. Even if you could try all the possible keys you learn nothing, because of the hand-waving about "plausible" plaintext.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- maxcoder4 3y agoBirthday attach is a real attack and often useful in practice. "Just use brute force" is a huge oversimplification, but the SO link explains it in more detail. One time pad is not a hash algorithm so obviously a generic attack on a collision function doesn't apply to it.