4 ms·
No person without body autonomy can be considered 'secure in their person, houses, papers, or effects'. In fact, none of the other rights matter when the state
by vkou 3y ago
No person without body autonomy can be considered 'secure in their person, houses, papers, or effects'.
In fact, none of the other rights matter when the state can control what you can, and can't do with your own body. It is the most fundamental of rights.
They are also doing a great job of trampling on the fourteenth amendment, with the occasional jabs at the first.
- philwelch 3y ago> No person without body autonomy can be considered 'secure in their person, houses, papers, or effects'. It wasn’t the southern states that imposed vaccine mandates for dining in restaurants, either. I know what you’re alluding to; suffice to say that I don’t find this legal theory particularly compelling, and more importantly, neither does the Supreme Court.