2 ms·
This is 30 times faster than SD (on its own, as opposed to LCM methods) right? Noting the "50" steps they referenced- whereas I've been using LCMs with 3-8 ste
by jasonjmcghee 3y ago
This is 30 times faster than SD (on its own, as opposed to LCM methods) right?
Noting the "50" steps they referenced- whereas I've been using LCMs with 3-8 steps for months.
Just trying to understand context of the paper / comparisons etc.
90ms is fast, but like 2-3x speedup (over what I've been seeing) which is still huge, but not 30x
Can someone with more context explain?
- sirwhinesalot 3y agoIt's 30x faster than 50 step SD with the same quality, unlike LCMs which can result in substantially lower quality. The actual page of the work shows the difference.