4 ms·

Wasn’t the monopoly interference in the first place?

• rpmisms 3y ago
  The hospitals would have shut down without it, so it was rubber-stamped as "let's not bail out the hospitals". If the monopoly functioned, there would be no issue.
  • fuzzfactor 3y ago
    >If the monopoly functioned, there would be no issue. So it was an experiment. Anything like politicians without professional health background using their constituents as medical test subjects?
    • peteradio 3y ago
      Look buddy if you don't like your freedom panels then you can giiiiiiiiiiiit out.
    • rpmisms 3y ago
      No, Tennessee does not practice deficit spending. It was a calculated move to avoid raising taxes, and a gamble that did not pay off. > Anything like politicians without professional health background using their constituents as medical test subjects? This is bad faith.
      • fuzzfactor 3y ago
        No hard feelings. >This is bad faith. You are correct. That's about the only faith I have in politicians, especially if they are Democrats or Republicans. It's more valuable to hear the experience of an informed constituent. I can accept it's more of a financial gamble than I thought.
        • rpmisms 3y ago
          I generally have zero issues with the Tennessee legislature, they do their jobs well and don't really mess with my life. They made a bad decision and are trying to figure out how to fix it without shuttering all the local hospitals, which is fine by me.
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]