The study by RJM is fundamentally flawed. It has taken a metric without any point of reference, accumulated some raw data and made some pretty wild interpretati

The study by RJM is fundamentally flawed. It has taken a metric without any point of reference, accumulated some raw data and made some pretty wild interpretations from there. I have rebutted it here: http://goo.gl/nDAVQ http://goo.gl/nDAVQ