3 ms·
Interesting. Was it actually UTF-8? Or was it UCS2? The thread in question is discussing UTF-8, as opposed to local codepages, but it's possible they're getting
by SuperNinKenDo 3y ago
Interesting. Was it actually UTF-8? Or was it UCS2? The thread in question is discussing UTF-8, as opposed to local codepages, but it's possible they're getting confused by the fact that it requires conversion to UTF-8 to pass the strings around. I'm guessing Windows is taking those UTF-8 strings and transparently converting them to UCS2 though, since Windows internals have stuck to UCS2 for so long.
- karmakaze 3y agoA search I did says: > The encoding used with wchar_t does not necessarily have to be UTF-16--it could also be UTF-32 for example.