3 ms·
One of the reasons people have studied FQHE has been to create (non-abelian) anyons and thereby a framework for topological quantum computing. Is that also the
by pred_ 3y ago
One of the reasons people have studied FQHE has been to create (non-abelian) anyons and thereby a framework for topological quantum computing. Is that also the story here?
- pyinstallwoes 3y agoI got downvoted to hell for providing the backstory to that. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39517011 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39517011
- LargoLasskhyfv 3y agoMehw? "In der Kürze liegt die Würze."
- nadermx 3y agoWhat did I just read?
- Terr_ 3y agoNot sure, but it may be time for some parents to have... The [Quantum Computing] Talk. :P > If you don't talk to your kids about quantum computing, someone else will. https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/the-talk-3 https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/the-talk-3
- DasCorCor 3y agoThe person who wrote that comic doesn’t understand QM and shouldn’t act like they do.
- Terr_ 3y ago> [Scott Aaronson, Computer Science professor and director of the University of Texas Quantum Information Center,] doesn't understand [Quantum Mechanics] and shouldn't act like they do. Huh, why exactly do you say that? P.S. There's an old AMA here too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17425377 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17425377
- nadermx 3y agoOP is just expressing his opinion in probability not amplitude
- djxejms 3y agoThis conspiracy theory is so weird and detailed. I don’t take it particularly seriously, but I would be less shocked if aspects of it turn out to be true than some other conspiracy theories.