2 ms·
off the archaic “whom”. One easy fix is using the modern 'whomst' everywhere. It has the all the faux-sophistication of 'whom' (with some extra borrowed from '
by pvg 3y ago
off the archaic “whom”.
One easy fix is using the modern 'whomst' everywhere. It has the all the faux-sophistication of 'whom' (with some extra borrowed from 'amongst' and 'whilst') while being equitably wrong to everyone rather than special groups like whom-pedant toffs and who-everywhere anarchists.
- keybored 3y agoPerfect :)