4 ms·
It's surprising to me that Sundar hasn't been fired after missing so badly on AI (along with a host of other misses in his tenure). Maybe it's coming, but I re
by spiderice 3y ago
It's surprising to me that Sundar hasn't been fired after missing so badly on AI (along with a host of other misses in his tenure). Maybe it's coming, but I really don't see what the Google board sees in him.
- yellow_postit 3y agoSundar is to Google what Ballmer was to Microsoft. If the board wants to shift focus from high confidence near/medium term revenue they likely need a new leader.
- websap 3y agoSince Sundar became CEO in August 2015, Google's market cap went from ~350B to ~2T , why do you think he's an ineffective CEO? Thats 6x returns!
- glimshe 3y agoCheck the competitors - why didn't Google grow as fast as Microsoft or Nvidia? So yeah, that's ineffective. Maybe you could have grown Google as much as Sundar because he was essentially sitting on a gold mine found by the Google founders.
- websap 3y agoSo, he consistently delivered higher returns than the market, but didn't grow as fast as the 2 fastest companies?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- spiderice 3y agoOh please. I don’t think I need to explain the flaw in this logic
- websap 3y agoYou took the time to type this out, so why don't you explain further?