I would consider myself in the AI+humans camp. However, I do not see the distinction between automating knowledge work and manual work in what you describe. Som

I would consider myself in the AI+humans camp. However, I do not see the distinction between automating knowledge work and manual work in what you describe. Somehow, knowledge workers seem to think what they do has some magic special sauce. I tend to think this is the result of human bias and not clear, first-principled thinking. You make a bold claim that automating knowledge work will be worse but don't show any data to confirm it. Even trivial cases can disprove it, however. Do you think knowledge work is worse when it is "automated" using an Excel spreadsheet vs a pencil and paper? >an absence of quality, humanity, agency, caring, fairness, all the things algorithms cannot and will not ever be or do. I would argue that automation can be quite better than humans on many of these domains. When they do fall short, it's often because they are reflecting (and in worse cases, amplifying) the shortcomings of humans in these same areas.