3 ms·

Interesting how different people's minds are. I find the exact opposite problem, I go with old faithful over new. It's for this reason that when I put my clot

Interesting how different people's minds are. I find the exact opposite problem, I go with old faithful over new. It's for this reason that when I put my clothes away I simply take the stack of clothes in my dresser out, put all the fresh stuff on the bottom, then put the clothes that were in the drawer stuff on top. I always grab the top sweater, t-shirt socks etc and I don't think about it at all.

adolph 3y ago
FILO is not the standard method of maintaining one's stock of clothes? How else does a person mange wear leveling?
- throwway120385 3y ago
  I wear whatever makes me feel good.
- edward28 3y ago
  Simply pop from the bottom of the dresser.
  - adolph 3y ago
    That method seems like it would have more cumulative effort than loading the cleaned clothes under the stack once a week. Additionally, I would probably rumple the stack pulling something out from underneath.
    - thfuran 3y ago
      I use a queue of stacks for each regularly used item type. Laundry is enqueued on one end of the drawer and popped from the other, with stacks slid over as needed.
- causi 3y ago
  You shouldn't. If you successfully manage wear leveling all you've done is make sure you have to replace your whole stock at the same time, as well as depriving yourself of regular reminders of what new-ish clothes should look and feel like, leading you to keep wearing worn-out clothes.
  - mnw21cam 3y ago
    With socks, wear levelling is actually really useful. I tend to buy a whole rotation of identical black socks, and then I don't need to pair them up individually. Also, buying 15 pairs of socks in one go isn't going to break the bank.
    - adolph 3y ago
      Wear leveling socks is a critical challenge for me. Unlike larger clothes, socks don’t stack easily, so defy conventional methods of stock rotation. How do you approach this? Would it make sense to buy one of those shelf springs that grocery stores use to keep boxes towards the from of the shelf?
      - arethuza 3y ago
        You need "Socks as a Service" (we could call it "SaaS") - every day someone drops off a new pair of socks and picks up your previous pair. If you pay for a premium plan then no multi-tenanting and only you get to wear any particular pair of socks.
        adolph 3y ago
        That sounds intriguing as I like not deciding. On the other hand, I'm sure SaaS has some premium over buying outright. Since I already have the capital outlay of a washer and drier and weekly time blocked for laundry of which socks is a very small percentage, I'm not certain if it would make sense. On the other hand, if there is a "complete casual work from home uniform" service, that might be worth it as long as some VCs are subsidizing it like its 2019.
- cyberax 3y ago
  My process: 1. Buy ~15 copies of everything. 2. Not think about what to wear! Everything is roughly the same. 3. Throw out everything every ~3 years. A couple of months before that, start buying new models of clothes to find the best one. 4. Goto 1.
  - adolph 3y ago
    > A couple of months before that, start buying new models of clothes to find the best one. This is so important. You'd think that manufacturers would just keep the same stuff for sale all the time for all time but it doesn't work that way. Lands End comes close for button shirts and wool trousers, but that formality level is wasteful for work from home. Edit: At first the 15 copies seemed excessive since only 7 are needed for weekly laundry, but basically you can get 2x longevity out of the stock based on laundry wear.
    - cyberax 3y ago
      Yeah, I'm absolutely pissed that New Balance had stopped making my favorite model of sneakers. I bought the last 5 pairs of them from a seller on eBay. Like, a model is great and it sells well, why would you stop making it?!? > Edit: At first the 15 copies seemed excessive since only 7 are needed for weekly laundry, but basically you can get 2x longevity out of the stock based on laundry wear. 1 week of clothes does not provide enough safety buffer for forgetfulness and procrastination. Also, travelling.
      - adolph 3y ago
        Shoes and glasses frames are the worst for not being able to just buy the same thing for all time. Glasses have gotten better since I was a kid but shoes worse. I’ve given up on shoe aesthetics since Mizuno makes upgrades the same model with different colors. Looks like the current version of Wave Rider is 27. Edit: Regarding total stock of clothes: this is a tricky balance between storage and wash cycle. Ideally I would do laundry nightly for day clothes and daily for pajamas so that no storage was necessary. With ~7 days storage already seems excessive since most days of the week there is more dirty than clean. It also only requires one load of laundry. With ~14 days that is twice the storage and while there are fewer batch operations there doesn’t seem to be a time savings since it would require two loads . . . Wait, do you scale in parallel by using a laundromat?
- tonyarkles 3y ago
  Lol, since we're going down this road... my clothing ends up getting stored more as a cache with an LRU policy. Every 6 months or so the items at the bottom of the drawer get assessed for eviction (donation). My favourite items are always on top, less used items are easy to find, and the unused items are easy to identify.
  - adolph 3y ago
    This is a much more efficient approach than Maria Kondo’s suggestion to hold each item up and determine its joy factor. Do you not procure multiple copies of items that have a high value assessment?
    - tonyarkles 3y ago
      I mean… I’ve got a bunch of fungible black t-shirts from Costco if that counts. They fit reasonably well. There are a bunch of more expensive unique items too. I do actually find it a bit interesting to see which ones float to the top and which ones don’t. Funny you mention Marie Kondo though. I do roll my clothes instead of folding them before putting them away into the cubes. I don’t entirely get it but it seems more space efficient that way.
  - riskable 3y ago
    Jeans get memoization! Wear them again before washing until something changes (e.g. spilled something on them) with an expiration time (e.g. 3 days or laundry day).

adolph 3y ago

FILO is not the standard method of maintaining one's stock of clothes? How else does a person mange wear leveling?

throwway120385 3y ago
I wear whatever makes me feel good.
edward28 3y ago
Simply pop from the bottom of the dresser.
- adolph 3y ago
  That method seems like it would have more cumulative effort than loading the cleaned clothes under the stack once a week. Additionally, I would probably rumple the stack pulling something out from underneath.
  - thfuran 3y ago
    I use a queue of stacks for each regularly used item type. Laundry is enqueued on one end of the drawer and popped from the other, with stacks slid over as needed.
causi 3y ago
You shouldn't. If you successfully manage wear leveling all you've done is make sure you have to replace your whole stock at the same time, as well as depriving yourself of regular reminders of what new-ish clothes should look and feel like, leading you to keep wearing worn-out clothes.
- mnw21cam 3y ago
  With socks, wear levelling is actually really useful. I tend to buy a whole rotation of identical black socks, and then I don't need to pair them up individually. Also, buying 15 pairs of socks in one go isn't going to break the bank.
  - adolph 3y ago
    Wear leveling socks is a critical challenge for me. Unlike larger clothes, socks don’t stack easily, so defy conventional methods of stock rotation. How do you approach this? Would it make sense to buy one of those shelf springs that grocery stores use to keep boxes towards the from of the shelf?
    - arethuza 3y ago
      You need "Socks as a Service" (we could call it "SaaS") - every day someone drops off a new pair of socks and picks up your previous pair. If you pay for a premium plan then no multi-tenanting and only you get to wear any particular pair of socks.
      - adolph 3y ago
        That sounds intriguing as I like not deciding. On the other hand, I'm sure SaaS has some premium over buying outright. Since I already have the capital outlay of a washer and drier and weekly time blocked for laundry of which socks is a very small percentage, I'm not certain if it would make sense. On the other hand, if there is a "complete casual work from home uniform" service, that might be worth it as long as some VCs are subsidizing it like its 2019.
cyberax 3y ago
My process: 1. Buy ~15 copies of everything. 2. Not think about what to wear! Everything is roughly the same. 3. Throw out everything every ~3 years. A couple of months before that, start buying new models of clothes to find the best one. 4. Goto 1.
- adolph 3y ago
  > A couple of months before that, start buying new models of clothes to find the best one. This is so important. You'd think that manufacturers would just keep the same stuff for sale all the time for all time but it doesn't work that way. Lands End comes close for button shirts and wool trousers, but that formality level is wasteful for work from home. Edit: At first the 15 copies seemed excessive since only 7 are needed for weekly laundry, but basically you can get 2x longevity out of the stock based on laundry wear.
  - cyberax 3y ago
    Yeah, I'm absolutely pissed that New Balance had stopped making my favorite model of sneakers. I bought the last 5 pairs of them from a seller on eBay. Like, a model is great and it sells well, why would you stop making it?!? > Edit: At first the 15 copies seemed excessive since only 7 are needed for weekly laundry, but basically you can get 2x longevity out of the stock based on laundry wear. 1 week of clothes does not provide enough safety buffer for forgetfulness and procrastination. Also, travelling.
    - adolph 3y ago
      Shoes and glasses frames are the worst for not being able to just buy the same thing for all time. Glasses have gotten better since I was a kid but shoes worse. I’ve given up on shoe aesthetics since Mizuno makes upgrades the same model with different colors. Looks like the current version of Wave Rider is 27. Edit: Regarding total stock of clothes: this is a tricky balance between storage and wash cycle. Ideally I would do laundry nightly for day clothes and daily for pajamas so that no storage was necessary. With ~7 days storage already seems excessive since most days of the week there is more dirty than clean. It also only requires one load of laundry. With ~14 days that is twice the storage and while there are fewer batch operations there doesn’t seem to be a time savings since it would require two loads . . . Wait, do you scale in parallel by using a laundromat?
tonyarkles 3y ago
Lol, since we're going down this road... my clothing ends up getting stored more as a cache with an LRU policy. Every 6 months or so the items at the bottom of the drawer get assessed for eviction (donation). My favourite items are always on top, less used items are easy to find, and the unused items are easy to identify.
- adolph 3y ago
  This is a much more efficient approach than Maria Kondo’s suggestion to hold each item up and determine its joy factor. Do you not procure multiple copies of items that have a high value assessment?
  - tonyarkles 3y ago
    I mean… I’ve got a bunch of fungible black t-shirts from Costco if that counts. They fit reasonably well. There are a bunch of more expensive unique items too. I do actually find it a bit interesting to see which ones float to the top and which ones don’t. Funny you mention Marie Kondo though. I do roll my clothes instead of folding them before putting them away into the cubes. I don’t entirely get it but it seems more space efficient that way.
- riskable 3y ago
  Jeans get memoization! Wear them again before washing until something changes (e.g. spilled something on them) with an expiration time (e.g. 3 days or laundry day).