3 ms·
I'd argue it's actually the people paying interest covering all those rewards. Credit Card companies know they have a high percent of people that don't pay off
by dawnerd 3y ago
I'd argue it's actually the people paying interest covering all those rewards. Credit Card companies know they have a high percent of people that don't pay off every month - especially travel focused cards.
- bombcar 3y agoWhat's fun, is if you run the math (let's assume $1k card) - the credit card companies make more money if you charge and pay off your $1k each month than if you charge $1k and then pay interest on it. Let's assume 3% merchant fee, they get 3% of each charge, so $30 a month, for $360 in a year. Most cards max at 30% interest, which would be $300 a year (technically less because you're paying it off each time). Even with the 3% once, that's $330. The banks aren't dumb. The interest they make is gravy.
- kelnos 3y agoNot sure about that. Consider that in Europe, credit cards are not as popular, perhaps in part because there's not much in the way of rewards programs. An oft-suggested reason for that is because card fees are legally capped pretty low in Europe.
- machomaster 3y agoYou try to explain why you don't necessarily agree and in doing that you confirm everything the parent said. Very confusing.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- bmicraft 3y agoThey probably weren't talking about high interest but vendor fees instead
- throwitaway222 3y agoYeah it is actually pretty insane, the middle class with a barely handle-able debt load are paying for the upper middle/upper class to have free flights, etc...
- Workaccount2 3y agoEven without the cards they are still doing that, hah