5 ms·

I noticed you didn't bring up them also taking napkins, sauce packets, sugar and creamer, cutlery etc. You either already were eating at wealthy enough places (

I noticed you didn't bring up them also taking napkins, sauce packets, sugar and creamer, cutlery etc. You either already were eating at wealthy enough places (metal cutlery + real cloth napkins) that this wasn't an opportunity for you & that was itself a class indicator, or you were focused on one thing (taking food home) and missing the bigger picture. Of course each individual action of preventing waste isn't a 100% indicator for having grown up in poverty. Low-waste is arguably fashionable, even. But being low-waste is different from acquiring and retaining arbitrary stuff to use later in place of things you can just buy when you need it. Buying a reusable straw is different from keeping every disposable straw you're given, same as buying a reusable bag is different from keeping every takeout/grocery plastic one. The house of my parents displays my impoverished childhood clearly-- it is a place of incredible resourcefulness using all the things people normally refuse to acquire or throw away if given to them.

pertymcpert 3y ago
I've been poor and I've never known anyone to take sauce packets. You're supposed to take what you need for your meal not so you can take them home. It's iffy ethically.
- erikerikson 3y ago
  It didn't seem they were suggesting raiding the supply so much as taking avoiding disposed packets.
- metalforever 3y ago
  I can assure you , a lot of people in my situation take sauce packets.
gnicholas 3y ago
> I noticed you didn't bring up them also taking napkins, sauce packets, sugar and creamer, cutlery etc. That wasn't the point of my story, so it would have been a distraction to mention. Even now, 20 years later, I have a drawer stuffed with free napkins, and I've kept some ketchup packets so long they burst. I was keeping my reply succinct, and the point was that it stands out when wealthy people take home leftovers, and some people view that as a positive thing.
- TeaDrunk 3y ago
  My point is not that no wealthy people save things. My point is that a lack of minimalism is often an indicator of the class where one grew up.
  - gnicholas 3y ago
    > My point is not that no wealthy people save things. That may not be your point in this comment, but in your original comment you listed several things (taking home leftovers, keeping sauce packets, hanging onto free pens) that you labeled as low-class indicators. These are only indicators of being low-class if they are not done by a significant number of non-low-class people. My point was that there are actually some people who are quite wealthy/comfortable who do these things also, and that some people (like law-school-me) react positively to it. The point is that people who do this because of their current situation or past situation need not feel embarrassed or odd for doing this, because some people see it as practical and commonsense.

pertymcpert 3y ago

I've been poor and I've never known anyone to take sauce packets. You're supposed to take what you need for your meal not so you can take them home. It's iffy ethically.

erikerikson 3y ago
It didn't seem they were suggesting raiding the supply so much as taking avoiding disposed packets.
metalforever 3y ago
I can assure you , a lot of people in my situation take sauce packets.

gnicholas 3y ago

> I noticed you didn't bring up them also taking napkins, sauce packets, sugar and creamer, cutlery etc. That wasn't the point of my story, so it would have been a distraction to mention. Even now, 20 years later, I have a drawer stuffed with free napkins, and I've kept some ketchup packets so long they burst. I was keeping my reply succinct, and the point was that it stands out when wealthy people take home leftovers, and some people view that as a positive thing.

TeaDrunk 3y ago
My point is not that no wealthy people save things. My point is that a lack of minimalism is often an indicator of the class where one grew up.
- gnicholas 3y ago
  > My point is not that no wealthy people save things. That may not be your point in this comment, but in your original comment you listed several things (taking home leftovers, keeping sauce packets, hanging onto free pens) that you labeled as low-class indicators. These are only indicators of being low-class if they are not done by a significant number of non-low-class people. My point was that there are actually some people who are quite wealthy/comfortable who do these things also, and that some people (like law-school-me) react positively to it. The point is that people who do this because of their current situation or past situation need not feel embarrassed or odd for doing this, because some people see it as practical and commonsense.