4 ms·
>When you are poor you spend the majority of your brain cycles dealing with your situation. I call it "Poor Brain/Rich Brain", and neither requires you to be r
by ramesh31 3y ago
>When you are poor you spend the majority of your brain cycles dealing with your situation.
I call it "Poor Brain/Rich Brain", and neither requires you to be rich or poor, although they are heavily correlated. A Poor Brain person will always take the immediate reward, even if it's not crucial to their survival. They fail the marshmallow test [0]. Rich Brain people will weigh the immediate reward against future opportunities, even if the immediate reward would significantly enhance their life, and the future opportunity is vague and undefined. It's about understanding that how you are perceived in certain situations can far outweigh your own ability to change your circumstances.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_marshmallow_experiment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_marshmallow_experimen...
- cycomanic 3y agoNice for you to make stuff up. The reality is that most statistics show that poor people tend to be much better with money than rich people. The myth that that poor people are poor because of poor management skills is just a stereotype that rich people tell themselves to feel good. Poor people are poor because they lack money. It's been shown over again the best way to get people out of poverty is to give them money. That's why microloan systems were so successful. Moreover financial training has essentially zero effect on lifting people out of poverty.
- geraldhh 3y ago> financial training has essentially zero effect on lifting people out of poverty "Free Advice is seldom cheap"
- alach11 3y agoMicroloan programs have largely been a disaster.
- Brusco_RF 3y ago>poor people tend to be much better with money than rich people. This does not pass the sniff test. Lets see your statistics?
- pierat 3y ago> They fail the marshmallow test Then you misunderstand the metric by poor people. If you eat the marshmallow now, you get a marshmallow. If you wait, it WILL disappear. You don't get a marshmallow. Basically, for poor people, the "future" is just future suffering, judgemental assholes in government cutting more funds cause you made $10 more this month (welfare cliff), and your sad equipment breaking down at the worst case causing whatever meager savings to evaporate like smoke.
- samatman 3y agoYou don't need to make up an inaccurate metaphor which will annoy people, bringing in a bunch of unsupported baggage. You're talking about time preference. What you've decided to call "poor brain" is simply high time preference, and "rich brain" is low time preference. There. Now you don't need to defend the implicit statistical correlation, or deal with those who are justly annoyed because it's unsupported and classist.
- nineplay 3y agoI'm not sure if you are alluding to this or not but the most obvious correlation between the marshmallow test in poverty is that people who grow up in poverty do not believe in future rewards. Their experience is that if someone tells you that you will get a marshmallow later, that marshmallow will never arrive. "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" accurately describes the experience of many people who grew up in poverty. It's a proverb for a reason.
- ramesh31 3y ago> Their experience is that if someone tells you that you will get a marshmallow later, that marshmallow will never arrive. Precisely. And the problem is that experience does not map to reality in all situations. Thus Poor Brain. It leaves you physically unable to see the long term risk/benefit. Loan a friend $20, and Poor Brain will demand it be paid back over and over again, even if it's not crucial to their survival, even ruining the friendship over it. Rich brain never mentions it, and uses it indirectly as leverage in every possible situation, far outweighing the original value of the $20. Call it $10 or $1 or whatever is a trivial amount of money to even a poor person in your society. Having Rich Brain does not require you to not need the money, only that you understand how much more valuable not getting the money is. It's about understanding the value in your relationships with people and how that vastly outweighs your own skills/talents/ambition/resources.
- AlotOfReading 3y agoI'm not sure what kind of poverty you've seen, but the kinds I'm familiar with both personally and from studies place far more emphasis on maintaining relationships and social capital because that's what they have. Lending or pooling money is not only common, but often without the expectation of direct repayment.
- ramesh31 3y ago>I'm not sure what kind of poverty you've seen, but the kinds I'm familiar with both personally and from studies place far more emphasis on maintaining relationships and social capital because that's what they have. Lending or pooling money is not only common, but often without the expectation of direct repayment. Fair, in that the experience I'm describing is among the poor whites of the US; a notoriously atomic and individualistic group. This probably does not map to other cultures as neatly.
- corinroyal 3y agoThe Stanford marshmallow experiment has been debunked. https://anderson-review.ucla.edu/new-study-disavows-marshmallow-tests-predictive-powers/ https://anderson-review.ucla.edu/new-study-disavows-marshmal...
- triceratops 3y agoI would've failed the Marshmallow Test as a child. I failed it this morning grabbing breakfast; I got 2 muffins instead of a single bagel. I'm not exactly hurting for money.
- incorrecthorse 3y agoThe vast majority of humanity is Poor Brain and therefore actual money is what matters.