3 ms·
Really appreciate the feedback. Can I ask what platform you'd be interested in using the software on? I'm 100% with you on e-waste -- I hate that we throw out
by davekeck 3y ago
Really appreciate the feedback. Can I ask what platform you'd be interested in using the software on?
I'm 100% with you on e-waste -- I hate that we throw out so much of our tech so quickly. (I used my 2016 iPhone SE as my main phone until last year haha.) My plan is to document as much of this thing as I can, including open-sourcing most (all?) of it. I've started small with open sourcing the embedded scheduler:
https://toaster.llc/blog/scheduler/ https://toaster.llc/blog/scheduler/
FWIW I focused on the Mac to begin with because it's what I use and love, and this thing took long enough to make even with that constraint.
- RicoElectrico 3y agoIn the absence of a manual available online I am not sure what the required capabilities would be. A very lightweight option is to use mass storage. If the file system (like some sort of flash-friendly FS) can't be block-accessed by common OSes there are some emulation workarounds (e.g. mbed on STM32 boards emulates FAT even though it's just a flashing tool) But otherwise if there's going to be a commandline Linux tool, that's most bang for a buck. Others can build upon it.