3 ms·
It was somebody on their phone, not signed in, and all they did was change "is" to "was" in two places, leaving the single word edit summary "was". But thank yo
by card_zero 3y ago
It was somebody on their phone, not signed in, and all they did was change "is" to "was" in two places, leaving the single word edit summary "was". But thank you for imagining Wikipedians are so professional.
- corobo 3y agoThank you for the clarification. Not sure I understand the snarky turn at the end there but I imagine I'm just lacking whatever context you have! No problem :)
- card_zero 3y agoTwo days later, I come back to find this downvoted a lot, even though I meant it literally. I've been a Wikipedia editor for some 10+ years, only a few of us use bots, we're not generally very sophisticated, so the assumptions amused me.
- corobo 3y agoAh. I think the wording plus the existing downvote when I read your reply made me not even consider it might be literal and not at all snarky.. I'd like to blame my British sarcasm-as-a-first-language upbringing, but really that one's on me. For what it's worth I've popped an upvote on your comment and will go out of my way to double check snark is actually snark before replying to things in future. Sorry for the misfiring assumption!