3 ms·
Using your flawed analogy: the picture is not blurry. It is a gigantic canvas filled in with false details.
by greenavocado 3y ago
Using your flawed analogy: the picture is not blurry. It is a gigantic canvas filled in with false details.
- jiggawatts 3y agoIt's false in the same sense that the pixels of lossy-compressed image are false. No, you're not going to get the precise values back out either with an LLM or a JPG image. Yes, the picture will still "look like" the original. You asked the LLM to output a URL or reference that looks like something that would appear in a research paper. It did so. You're complaining the precise byte sequence returned is not what you wanted. The error is with your expectations, not the tool.