3 ms·
Not sure that llm autocomplete is so much better than autocomplete using more energy efficient algorithms to make a noticeable difference in productivity.
by gmm1990 3y ago
Not sure that llm autocomplete is so much better than autocomplete using more energy efficient algorithms to make a noticeable difference in productivity.
- pants2 3y agoGreat, then you won't buy the $20/mo copilot package and save energy!
- bamboozled 3y agoThe world doesn’t work this way, you have to use it to stay competitive. Even if you don’t like it.
- Turing_Machine 3y agoHmm... so it's so bad that you might as well just use old-school autocorrect, and so good that you have to use it to remain competitive, at the same time?
- bamboozled 3y agoYou're making that claim. Our company buys it for us to "stay ahead", whether we use it or not, we're paying for it.
- Turing_Machine 3y ago> You're making that claim. No, that is literally your claim combined with the claim of the original poster. In your first post you claimed you "had" to use it. Now you say it's optional?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]