2 ms·
Even with billions on the line, semiconductor shortages can take years to resolve. Consider the 2020–2023 chip shortage, which hit automakers especially hard.
by tedsanders 3y ago
Even with billions on the line, semiconductor shortages can take years to resolve.
Consider the 2020–2023 chip shortage, which hit automakers especially hard. When COVID19 struck in 2020, car sales plunged by 30%–90%, inducing many automakers to cancel future chip orders. Then when demand rebounded unexpectedly quickly, automakers found that there were not enough chips to buy, nor enough available manufacturing capacity to make them.
This shortage of chips was severe. Every major automaker (including Toyota,Volkswagen, Daimler, Ford, Honda, and GM) were forced to idle manufacturing plants. In 2021 alone, the chip shortage reduced auto production by ~11 million vehicles, costing an estimated $210B in auto revenue(!). In response, the White House convened 3 summits and signed the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022.
Building extra semiconductor manufacturing tools takes years. Even in late 2022, lead times of various tools were as high as 24-30 months, and lead times of some chips were still over 100 weeks.
Literally hundreds of billions of dollars of automotive revenue (tens of billions of profit) were sitting as a prize to anyone who could make some extra chips for automakers. And this is a relatively “easy” task - automotive is only a small ~10% slice of the semiconductor market, and doesn’t even need the leading edge technology nodes, where production is even more bottlenecked. Yet even with this massive prize of billions of dollars, the industry couldn’t match this demand in under 3 years. It’s not for lack of skill or effort — these companies have hundreds of thousands of employees, a large fraction with advanced degrees — but simply because the modern semiconductor supply chain is fantastically complex.
When designing a supply chain, cost trades off against resilience. If you minimize cost (e.g., single sourcing crucibles from the lowest cost provider), you lose resilience (e.g., it may take you months to recover from that single source going offline unexpectedly).
- chasil 3y agoOne easy way for the automakers to solve their problems would be to exploit Moore's law, and move all of their designs to a 28nm planar node of transistor production (which are somewhat more durable than the smaller FINFET nodes). Because many of them were still at 180nm (or higher), they wasted the silicon material with a much larger die size. Spend the money to stay current. Nobody is going to mass-produce vacuum tubes for you overnight.
- Retric 3y agoI think the automotive chip shortage actually shows the opposite of what you think it does. The industry largely shut down, a global pandemic causing massive shipping issues for a huge range of components hitting a complex industry focused on just in time supply chains and complex logistics combined with poor forecasting of demand resulted in a 12% reduction in output over a year. Which then quickly caught back up. That’s so wildly far from catastrophe it’s laughable, economic swings frequently have larger impacts on car sales. The pandemic hurt the automobile industry less than several others, companies didn’t fail, and things quickly caught back up. So yes disruptions mean a temporary reduction in output and possibly a significant period catching up, but suggesting it would take an industry years to deal with X issue just doesn’t line up with how companies actually behave.
- chasil 3y agoAs I understand it, the "legacy" production capacity that the automobile manufacturers canceled/forfeited was (re)sold to other customers. When car sales picked up, the order books were full and there were were no immediately-available fabs. The foundries did not appear to have as substantial of a downturn.