3 ms·
The burden of proof is on the people requesting the feature. The reason for not building any feature is simple: users don't care about it and there are more val
by shuckles 3y ago
The burden of proof is on the people requesting the feature. The reason for not building any feature is simple: users don't care about it and there are more valuable other features to build. (As evidenced by system apps not being deletable on iOS for its first decade.)
- noapologies 3y ago> The burden of proof is on the people requesting the feature. Fortunately there are other reasons why a business may be forced to do something, and not allowed to be the sole judge/jury/executioner. One of those is anti-trust action - something that greatly benefits humanity as a whole, even though the alternative may (or may not) be cheaper for the business. Other examples are employee protections, consumer protections, constitutional amendments etc.
- shuckles 3y agoWhich goes back to my original point: there is literally no benefit besides navel gazing for requiring the photos app to be deletable. Just because there are many reasons one could compel a company to do something does not mean any of them are applicable to this request.