This is substanceless series of rethorical flexes. eg. the comparison with Target as a store. Had Apple from the beginning allowed and encouraged sideloading a

This is substanceless series of rethorical flexes. eg. the comparison with Target as a store. Had Apple from the beginning allowed and encouraged sideloading and alternative stores then that analogy had potentially been fair. But as a customer service ou cannot go to "the other side of the street". Also, what stores can and cannot sell is heavily regulated already. So that analogy is really a disservice to pro Apple people who are against regulation.