3 ms·
Data isnt linked to in the article and browsing ZipRecruiters website I cant find it or anything that supports this... That being said I'm sure they have SOME d
by AlwaysRock 3y ago
Data isnt linked to in the article and browsing ZipRecruiters website I cant find it or anything that supports this... That being said I'm sure they have SOME data that supports this but having worked at a recruiting company that put out an annual report in the past, this data is probably questionable at best.
Recruiting companies are hired to fill roles companies cant fill on their own. Typically hard to fill roles. (many) People like working remotely and are used to it now. Companies who want people to come into an office have a hard time finding people. ZipRecruiter puts out a little pro in office propaganda to help their conversation numbers when they get a, "I dont want to commute to an office" response to their recruiter spam.
Literary zero downside for them in doing this. Again, I'm sure there is SOME data that SOME company paid more for SOME people to be in office than remote. Is it significant? It really doesnt matter now that the BBC picked up their pro office propaganda.
- DecentRecruiter 3y agoIn-office employers are raising compensation to compete against remote companies. Especially in tech, they need to up the ante if they're going to attract top talent.