3 ms·
Yes, that change I wouldn’t call handicapping; although I’m sure Apple would. On the other hand, I think it’s reasonable to suggest that greater interoperabili
by truculent 3y ago
Yes, that change I wouldn’t call handicapping; although I’m sure Apple would.
On the other hand, I think it’s reasonable to suggest that greater interoperability could result in some features being degraded or unavailable (maybe certain things happen slower, or consume more battery life, for example). We might still decide this is worth it overall, but it could genuinely handicap the UX.
- aftbit 3y agoReally? Can you give an example? I don't see why performance or battery life would need to be impacted for users of the default services. In other words, if you want to keep using Apple-only stuff, you would get the same outcome as today.