4 ms·
It’s referring to the collaboration on the design itself.
by overview 3y ago
It’s referring to the collaboration on the design itself.
- diggan 3y agoEven that isn't true. Lots of original models/drawings have been lost, new designers interpret or reconstruct what they think Gaudi wanted to do, based on incomplete plans or where decisions weren't fully made. Not to mention new materials are available today that are being used and new processes/workflows which change the results slightly too. Sagrada Familia isn't a 100% implementation of the original vision, as even the original vision was incomplete when Gaudi died.
- rob74 3y agoOk, maybe he didn't specify how all the statues, doors, windows and other embellishments should look like, but the basic structure and shape (the three portals and the 18 spires which also determine how the support columns in the interior of the church are placed) is the same as in Gaudí's original plans.
- matthewdgreen 3y agoThe original statement still makes sense, though, if you correctly interpret it as critique and warning.
- CPLX 3y agoSometimes people say things indirectly. In this case what they are saying is that Gaudi’s design sense is so unique and iconoclastic that it’s essentially impossible to mix it with other styles of design.
- lucianbr 3y agoBuzzword bingo isn't restricted to software. The statement just says "Gaudi was a great architect". But it sounds more impressive to talk about "posthumous collaboration", especially if you don't analyze it.
- epolanski 3y ago> Sagrada Familia isn't a 100% implementation of the original vision That's what makes it more interesting and fascinating.