3 ms·

A fine sentiment, but (FWIW) it goes into a ditch when dealing with CJK.

• WalterBright 3y ago
  One unique sequence per unique glyph takes care of all that.
  • euroderf 3y ago
    Ah, but define "unique" after centuries of borrowing.
    • WalterBright 3y ago
      If the glyphs are the same, then they have the same Unicode sequence. Nothing hard to understand about that.
      • euroderf 3y ago
        Well, nothing I've read about Unicode & CJK makes me think that it is that straightforward.
        • WalterBright 3y ago
          That's because people get tangled up in the idea that Unicode glyphs are supposed to be imbued with semantic content. Remove that, and the problems go away.