3 ms·
That's a highly specific solution that doesn't address the fundamental interplay between atomics and various kinds of synchronization primitives.
by PaulDavisThe1st 3y ago
That's a highly specific solution that doesn't address the fundamental interplay between atomics and various kinds of synchronization primitives.
- lostmsu 3y agoThis objection of yours was directly addressed by the comment I'm trying to support. E.g. yes, it is important to know the low-level details, but also the abstraction chosen is just not fit for the purpose. And it's partially fault of C++ because channels are not in the standard library.