4 ms·
I recommended "Loyal workers are selectively and ironically targeted for exploitation". [1] From the general discussion: > Across four studies, we found consi
by araes 3y ago
I recommended "Loyal workers are selectively and ironically targeted for exploitation". [1] From the general discussion:
> Across four studies, we found consistent support for our hypotheses. First, we found that loyal employees are selectively targeted by managers for exploitation in hypothetical scenarios (Studies 1–2), and that the targeting of these loyal workers is mediated by the expectation that loyal people are readily willing to make personal sacrifices for the objects of their loyalty (Study 1). These effects were specific to targets with reputations for loyalty (Study 2)."
"Organizations Weaken the Norm of Reciprocity" [2] from the follow on citation work is also interesting. Basically, a lot of math and surveys to show that diffuse organizations and the "workplace interaction" mentality, tend to result in people helping you less when you help them, work deserving reciprocity getting lost in the organization (it's just business), and business interactions always being viewed as a "what are they gonna do for me?".
Not directly answering your question, yet evidence that Fortune 500's and FAANGs, as large organizations, generally shift towards exploitive, or at the least, behaviors lacking the reciprocity expected. Which tends to burn people out.
[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022103122001615?via%3Dihub https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00221...
[2] https://aom.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/AMD/How%20Organization%20Belmi.pdf https://aom.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/AMD/How%20Organiz...
- RemoteIsHeaven 3y ago> Fortune 500's and FAANGs, as large organizations, generally shift towards exploitive, or at the least, behaviors lacking the reciprocity expected 1. What could be causing that? 2. What are the chances of this same behavior happening at a Fortune 500000? 3. How would an employee detect that behavior, potentially as early as when interviewing for the job?
- araes 3y ago1. The first paper's rationale, is: "agents/entities with less power may not feel free to decline the more powerful agent/entity's request". The second paper would probably argue that "the diffuse nature of large organizations reduces reciprocation so it's lack becomes normalized" (my paraphrase). 2. The second paper would probably say lower. Closer to a small friend / family group, with more obvious reciprocal behavior. 3. Maybe if they ask you to do a bunch of weird stuff on the interview? Give you a bunch of homework that feels like "off the clock time". I donno. With the second, only that maybe it all feels super hands-off in hiring, like you're just being handed to someone.