3 ms·
It isn't clear, but it seems like investigators are saying "Give us a list of all IPs that watched these 8 youtube videos on this day". Considering all of the v
by IncreasePosts 3y ago
It isn't clear, but it seems like investigators are saying "Give us a list of all IPs that watched these 8 youtube videos on this day". Considering all of the videos have 30,000 views total, if the videos were independent in some manner(ie not by the same creator, or recommended one after the other), the odds seem really low that more than 1 person watched all of them.
This seems in line with other types of legal subpoenas - I can't recall the exact situation, but after a string of bank robberies across a state, police subpoenaed cell tower records for cell phones that had pinged towers near each bank while it was being robbed, and that quickly led them to the robbers.
edit: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/how-cell-tower-dumps-caught-the-high-country-bandits-and-why-it-matters/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/how-cell-tower-d...
Turns out the cops got all the cell tower records for 4 rural robberies, and did the intersection themselves, but I don't know why the phone co couldn't do that.
- delusional 3y agoI think I'd rather have some democratic governmental agency process the data, and just have the private entities provide it. It's much easier to make rules assuming the private companies are never supposed to process the data instead of trying to carve out exceptions. I don't actually trust YouTube with processing my watch history when I use their service, but I don't have any other options.
- Lockal 3y agoIt is very likely that they will only detect 1) automation scripts like https://addshore.com/2022/09/hunting-youtube-crypto-scams/ https://addshore.com/2022/09/hunting-youtube-crypto-scams/ 2) scrapers from analytics systems 3) botnet nodes to boost view count