3 ms·
I’ve recently been disillusioned in my admiration for NASA. How NASA used a child math prodigy back in the 1970s: “ At that time, I led my life like a machine
by nobodyandproud 3y ago
I’ve recently been disillusioned in my admiration for NASA.
How NASA used a child math prodigy back in the 1970s: “ At that time, I led my life like a machine – I woke up, solved the daily assigned equation, ate, slept, and so forth. I really didn’t know what I was doing, and I was lonely and had no friends.”
Career scientists and engineers using a kid like this? Pretty scummy in my book.
Compare that to how Srinivasa Ramanujan was treated nearly a century earlier by the British.
Sadly, your schools’s computer time wouldnt have made anyone blink.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- npteljes 3y agoIf it's the British and the treatment of the brilliant people, the story that comes to mind is of Alan Turing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Turing#Homosexuality_and_indecency_conviction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Turing#Homosexuality_and_...
- nobodyandproud 3y agoVery poor example. Technical brilliance didn't protect Alan Turing from a badly-written sex law pushed out in 1885, but technical brilliance wasn't the cause of his mistreatment. Whereas it was technical brilliance that made a young, 8-year-old 210 iq child the target of exploitation by NASA in an era where child-exploitation was already frowned upon for decades. And of course, in the height of irony one of the aims of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Law_Amendment_Act_1885 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Law_Amendment_Act_188... was to protect the very young; so a very poor example indeed.