3 ms·
I think the issue is more the cost of the anti-matter than the fuel to payload ratio. Chemical rocket people can only dream of 1:1 fuel to payload. Look how muc
by hermitcrab 3y ago
I think the issue is more the cost of the anti-matter than the fuel to payload ratio. Chemical rocket people can only dream of 1:1 fuel to payload. Look how much Saturn V + fuel to took to get a tiny payload to the moon and back.
- jvanderbot 3y agoThe issue is the cost. But the trope is "Well if we could manage the cost, 1/1 will actually get us places." As opposed to more conventional solutions, which require 1e5 / 1, or more, or more magical ones, that make no sense.
- hermitcrab 3y agoOk, I misunderstood what you were saying. I think we agree. ;0)
- jvanderbot 3y agoPerfectly understandable, now that I re-read it.