> and that executives wanting to entice users to use their products, or deter them from switching, is all the same thing and just good business, not anti-compet

> and that executives wanting to entice users to use their products, or deter them from switching, is all the same thing and just good business, not anti-competitive behavior. But lots of good business becomes anti-competitive behavior once you’re judged to be the subject to antitrust law. So, the main issue is whether antitrust law should apply to them. That, IMO, is a case won as less on the letter of the law (which, as I understand it, is fairly vague) than on what ‘the people’ want it to mean today.