4 ms·

The reverse explanation (bowel cancer recurrence -> decreased coffee consumption) should be kept in mind. There have been similar findings about caffeine and m

The reverse explanation (bowel cancer recurrence -> decreased coffee consumption) should be kept in mind. There have been similar findings about caffeine and miscarriage, for instance, with higher caffeine intake associated with greater miscarriage risk. Then it was found that women who eventually miscarried are less likely to get morning sickness, and therefore less likely to feel nauseous from drinking coffee, and therefore drink more of it. A similar causal path might be going on.

ryan-duve 3y ago
I'm curious about the numbers reported by the researchers that led to those results. Do you have any references to those studies you can share?
- derbOac 3y ago
  About miscarriage and caffeine? Unfortunately it's been awhile since I looked into it, due to our own issues with miscarriage. I did a quick look to find what I was thinking of and couldn't find it offhand only because there were so many studies to wade through. The study I was thinking looked at nausea timing and changes in consumption of caffeine, and found that the risk for miscarriage associated with caffeine was mediated by nausea, but specifically by the tendency for women without miscarriage to decrease their caffeine intake after morning sickness occurring when it usually does. Nausea later in pregnancy didn't seem to be related to miscarriage risk, nor did caffeine intake. It looks like there are various studies coming to different conclusions about this though so maybe that was just one of many: https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/52/1/165/6605011?login=false https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/52/1/165/6605011?login=... https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S000293780702025X https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00029...
willmadden 3y ago
Do you know how many of these articles plague the internet? Writing an article headline that implies correlation is causation should mean a death sentence for the author or operator of the AI that wrote the clickbait article. Apply the same rule to "content based marketing".

ryan-duve 3y ago

I'm curious about the numbers reported by the researchers that led to those results. Do you have any references to those studies you can share?

derbOac 3y ago
About miscarriage and caffeine? Unfortunately it's been awhile since I looked into it, due to our own issues with miscarriage. I did a quick look to find what I was thinking of and couldn't find it offhand only because there were so many studies to wade through. The study I was thinking looked at nausea timing and changes in consumption of caffeine, and found that the risk for miscarriage associated with caffeine was mediated by nausea, but specifically by the tendency for women without miscarriage to decrease their caffeine intake after morning sickness occurring when it usually does. Nausea later in pregnancy didn't seem to be related to miscarriage risk, nor did caffeine intake. It looks like there are various studies coming to different conclusions about this though so maybe that was just one of many: https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/52/1/165/6605011?login=false https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/52/1/165/6605011?login=... https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S000293780702025X https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00029...

willmadden 3y ago

Do you know how many of these articles plague the internet? Writing an article headline that implies correlation is causation should mean a death sentence for the author or operator of the AI that wrote the clickbait article. Apply the same rule to "content based marketing".