4 ms·
I think everyone agrees that it's much better to clean up pollution, but the problem is not really so much that we are bombarded with more pollution (in many pl
by hn_throwaway_99 3y ago
I think everyone agrees that it's much better to clean up pollution, but the problem is not really so much that we are bombarded with more pollution (in many places, especially in the West, most measures of environmental pollution are much lower than in the past), the problem is you are just constantly bombarded with more information. Some of it is valid, but nearly all of it is designed to scare you.
Just consider this study, which is simply bad reporting. Check out some of the other comments in this thread, but all of these numbers can simply be explained by the growth in the global population during the study period. Actual per-capita cancer deaths among young people are way down during this timeframe.
- bamboozled 3y agoMore young people in the southern hemisphere are dead from skin cancer than would be otherwise if we didn’t pollute the atmosphere with CFCs,l and put a hole in the ozone layer, for example. We might’ve seen a decline in cancer rates even with more people if we didn’t pollute so much. Imagine living in a less polluted world with the medicine we have now ? Wouldn’t that be fantastic?