3 ms·
An approach to design high-power lithium sulfur batteries
- nntwozz 3y agoWhat about weight? No mention of it vs. Li-ion.
- lmpdev 3y agoDon’t forget that high power is still a worthwhile target in and of itself Not all applications for batteries are completely focused on power density
- bruce511 3y agoAs a home owner with residential solar, I don't care about weight. On the other hand any supplication involving transport does. Both are very large markets, so weight would be a good point, especially if it was materially different. So while you are correct, not all applications are weight sensitive, its an important factor. Or, to put it another way, if you discovered the new battery was half the weight of li-ion, how would that affect your opinion?
- acrid_acre 3y agoSurprisingly when things become heavy enough the ground by itself isn't enough anymore and you start needing supports for heavy things
- Gravityloss 3y agoInteresting thought. If these are super cheap, at some point the foundations or the land they are on becomes a significant cost issue. Say for example if a 12 m long and 2.3 m wide standard 40 ft container weighs 16,000 kg (16 t), how many can you pile on an old parking lot? I would assume the cost of the batteries (and then after that things like inverters) is still so high everything else is in the noise.
- tomek_ycomb 3y agoRandomly grabbed some soil strength (it varies alot), but a reasonable number seems 3000 pounds per square foot. That puts your number at. (3k4010) / (16k*2.2) (estimating width of the 40 foot at 10 feet), Uhh.. 34 containers. I think that's enough. In reality you would be able to drive helicoil foundations or any number of things to change the dynamic. I agree the foundations would be secondary to the rest of the system cost in general though
- nntwozz 3y agoWeight is a big deal for ebikes, especially eMTBs. I wouldn't mind a lighter phone/laptop either.
- hgomersall 3y ago"A specific energy of specific energy of 1,306 Wh/kg", though it has an s suffix on the kg which denotes what I know not.
- rzzzt 3y agoOne of the values is followed by "based on the mass of sulfur" so I guess this applies across all of the numbers in the article with the suffix. So Watt-hours per kilogram of sulphur.
- analog31 3y agoI realize it's probably too soon to know, but what about safety? I think about the fact that hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide are both toxic gases.
- ricardobeat 3y agoThere doesn’t seem to be any elemental sulfur in these batteries, so how would those be formed? In other articles this chemistry is said to be much safer than Li-ion.
- analog31 3y agoI'm thinking in a fire.
- RetroTechie 3y agoCommon Li-ions contain fluoride (in separator and/or electrolyte additives, iirc). Which upon combustion produce HF and other nasties. Compared to that, I'd rather take my chances with sulfur compounds.