4 ms·
Pure zstd (or .tar.zstd) vs pack vs patched 7z+zstd would be more interesting, how much overhead introduced by pack format itself - in size and speed
by out_of_protocol 3y ago
Pure zstd (or .tar.zstd) vs pack vs patched 7z+zstd would be more interesting, how much overhead introduced by pack format itself - in size and speed
- OttoCoddo 3y agoI answered this question here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39801083 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39801083 If that is not enough, let me know.
- out_of_protocol 3y agotar.zst vs pack is looking great, thanks! Also there is https://github.com/mcmilk/7-Zip-zstd https://github.com/mcmilk/7-Zip-zstd .pack vs zst-7z with the same compression settings would b interesting. That will be pure container overhead