4 ms·
Then why are you advocating for it? > or query/list comprehensions List comprehensions are column first.
by Izkata 3y ago
Then why are you advocating for it?
> or query/list comprehensions
List comprehensions are column first.
- naasking 3y agoRight, here's the nuance: list comprehensions are intended to be concise one-liners, so having the results definition far off to the right defeats the principle I was outlining. Most SQL queries are not like this, they are almost always multiline of the form: select x, y, z from Foo where a or b Here the opposite is the case: selection-first moves the return definition far from the subsequent code that uses it. So if you're going to support list comprehensions, a monadic do-style notation which lets you chain them and again places select last: https://wiki.haskell.org/List_comprehension#List_monad https://wiki.haskell.org/List_comprehension#List_monad