2 ms·
I have no idea what the legal weight is for a toml field so this repo really would benefit from having a formal copy of the Apache-2 license file https://github
by mdaniel 3y ago
I have no idea what the legal weight is for a toml field so this repo really would benefit from having a formal copy of the Apache-2 license file https://github.com/hacspec/hax/blob/2da100068e9ae5e69e5b35bb237e2f6db5b063a2/Cargo.toml#L45 https://github.com/hacspec/hax/blob/2da100068e9ae5e69e5b35bb... similar to its MIT friend https://github.com/hacspec/hacspec/blob/4ecc847fc944fe996e19423aa41f002f2039dab0/LICENSE https://github.com/hacspec/hacspec/blob/4ecc847fc944fe996e19...
- wizzwizz4 3y ago> I have no idea what the legal weight is for a toml field Law is usually about what's communicated. If "Apache-2" unambiguously refers to a particular license, I don't see the benefit in including a copy of it. (I'd go for "Apache-2.0", though – as they've done –, since that's the SPDX short identifier.)
- csande17 3y agoWell, the Apache License does say "You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License" when you're redistributing the code. Including a copy of the license in the repo makes it easier for people to comply with that requirement.