5 ms·
The article ends with the news source they got the story from: http://www.techspot.com/news/48601-kodak-maintained-an-underground-nuclear-reactor-for-over-30-ye
by coderdude 14y ago
The article ends with the news source they got the story from: http://www.techspot.com/news/48601-kodak-maintained-an-underground-nuclear-reactor-for-over-30-years.html http://www.techspot.com/news/48601-kodak-maintained-an-under...
The source is much cleaner than the submitted site. After reading both articles I feel that the submission is just a rip-off.
Edit: I didn't go deep enough down the rabbit hole. Thanks eli & falling.
- eli 14y agoNo, actually that links to the poorly written gizmodo story. Itself a knockoff of the local paper, http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120511/NEWS01/305120021/Kodak-Park-nuclear-reactor?gcheck=1&nclick_check=1 http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120511/NEWS01/... Pretty sure that is both the original source and the most accurate write up.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- falling 14y agoI think this is the original source http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120511/NEWS01/305120021/Kodak-Park-nuclear-reactor http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120511/NEWS01/... and it's a better article too.
- gaius 14y agoI smell an agenda piece. Who are these "Center for Nonproliferation Studies" exactly? Is that even a real subject? What do they know about photographic imaging, which is all about radiation, or any other industrial process? Who are they that scientists should beg their permission to work?
- falling 14y agoreally? the article seemed pretty neutral to me, no sensationalistic spin.