4 ms·
I don’t think that’s universally true. Monero, for instance, doesn’t have this flaw.
by politician 3y ago
I don’t think that’s universally true. Monero, for instance, doesn’t have this flaw.
- shafyy 3y agoI'm not familiar with how exactly Monero works. But as long as it uses a public blockchain, there must be traces of money coming into Monero and money going out - you can probably do it very smartly, but if you move big amounts of money, it will be very hard to hide it.
- zamalek 3y agoMonero is laundering embodied as a protocol. You mix your transactions in a series of "signature rings" - that gives me a pretty strong image of money in a laundry machine. It's definitely still possible to use it incorrectly (not enough laundering steps, converting ransoms to Bitcoin/fiat all at once).
- tromp 3y ago> if you move big amounts of money Most privacy enhanced coins hide the amounts with so-called confidential transactions, so only the parties involved know the amount being transferred. Huge amounts are no harder to hide than small ones.
- shafyy 3y agoIsn't one of the "advantages" of cryptocurrencies that all transactiosn can be verified decentrally and indpendently? How would you do that if people can hide the transaction details?
- tromp 3y agoYou do that with so-called Pedersen commitments [1] [2]. [1] https://elementsproject.org/features/confidential-transactions/investigation https://elementsproject.org/features/confidential-transactio... [2] https://mareknarozniak.com/2021/06/22/ct/ https://mareknarozniak.com/2021/06/22/ct/