4 ms·
So if you managed a team, and when you look at commit histories you notice that one person has <1 commit a month and you look at the commits and they're trivial
by khazhoux 3y ago
So if you managed a team, and when you look at commit histories you notice that one person has <1 commit a month and you look at the commits and they're trivial... you would disregard any concerns?
- jen20 3y agoI would wonder how it got to the second month, certainly - getting to the point where this kind of post-hoc analysis can actually be done is a serious failing of management.
- xandrius 3y agoThe answer is still "it depends", I would imagine that issues would arise well before you had to look at their commit history. I believe that if you are a good manager, you would just need to look at what tickets get done during the sprint and that's it. If you complete your tickets and pass QA/UAT in 10 LOC, so be it. There is no need to micromanage.