3 ms·
You're not wrong, but probably applying a critique which is irrelevant to the product under discussion. I don't think potential owners of 'robotic pets' will be
by tweetle_beetle 3y ago
You're not wrong, but probably applying a critique which is irrelevant to the product under discussion. I don't think potential owners of 'robotic pets' will be making purchases based on maximising payload capacity, or practical real-world applications.
- tamimio 3y agoYou are not wrong either, hence why I said > QUGVs are primarily beneficial for educational purposes… But it still beneficial to give a heads up for anyone before investing efforts and time that QUGVs are simply for these purposes, which is something you can see in some comments in here, personally, I would invest those efforts in drones but YMMV.
- idiotsecant 3y agoWhat efforts are you saying are poorly invested? Objective: robot cat. Output: robot cat. Seems like everyone is getting what they want and you're just inserting a random pedantic critique.
- admax88qqq 3y agoPeak HN "I want to build a robot cat" "What you really want to build is a drone because quadrupeds cannot go downstairs backwards"
- Avicebron 3y agoIt's a Stack Overflow overflow...