I doubt the differences in performance between all the „neural“ models are statistically significant. It strikes me as odd that a model like TFT can be the wors

I doubt the differences in performance between all the „neural“ models are statistically significant. It strikes me as odd that a model like TFT can be the worst of the „neural“ models in one benchmark and at the same time be the best in another benchmark. Also what is the point of Benchmark I ? „It comprises 15 datasets that were also part of the training data of Chronos models“ . That is not forecasting. That is just remembering/overfitting these time series.